You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a discussion aimed at cores and destroyables after #995, in PGM up until now those objectives have always appeared under the team that has to attach such objective, so the scheme (red) 0% (meaning: uncompleted), and (green) 100% (meaning: completed) makes sense. However, when the objectives stop being displayed under a specific team, and are shared, this scheme may not make as much sense, and showing them from the perspective of the defender as (green) 0% (meaning: still standing, or still defended), and (red) 100% (meaning: destroyed, no longer standing). The green would be accompanied by a tick, and red with an X in case of non-obs and percentage not being shown.
This is open for discussion, should this be implemented? Does it make sense to change such a fundamental PGM thing or should we stick to what we have?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Referencing a couple discussions had over the past bit since this issue was made, the general conclusion seems to be that shared DTC/M objectives should appear as described here, while keeping non-shared DTC/M objectives as they currently appear and have appeared for years.
This is a discussion aimed at cores and destroyables after #995, in PGM up until now those objectives have always appeared under the team that has to attach such objective, so the scheme (red) 0% (meaning: uncompleted), and (green) 100% (meaning: completed) makes sense. However, when the objectives stop being displayed under a specific team, and are shared, this scheme may not make as much sense, and showing them from the perspective of the defender as (green) 0% (meaning: still standing, or still defended), and (red) 100% (meaning: destroyed, no longer standing). The green would be accompanied by a tick, and red with an X in case of non-obs and percentage not being shown.
This is open for discussion, should this be implemented? Does it make sense to change such a fundamental PGM thing or should we stick to what we have?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: