Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle shared objectives inversely in scoreboard (RFC) #997

Open
Pablete1234 opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Handle shared objectives inversely in scoreboard (RFC) #997

Pablete1234 opened this issue Apr 22, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
discussion Just talking help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@Pablete1234
Copy link
Member

Pablete1234 commented Apr 22, 2022

This is a discussion aimed at cores and destroyables after #995, in PGM up until now those objectives have always appeared under the team that has to attach such objective, so the scheme (red) 0% (meaning: uncompleted), and (green) 100% (meaning: completed) makes sense. However, when the objectives stop being displayed under a specific team, and are shared, this scheme may not make as much sense, and showing them from the perspective of the defender as (green) 0% (meaning: still standing, or still defended), and (red) 100% (meaning: destroyed, no longer standing). The green would be accompanied by a tick, and red with an X in case of non-obs and percentage not being shown.

This is open for discussion, should this be implemented? Does it make sense to change such a fundamental PGM thing or should we stick to what we have?

@Pablete1234 Pablete1234 added help wanted Extra attention is needed discussion Just talking labels Apr 22, 2022
@calcastor
Copy link
Contributor

Referencing a couple discussions had over the past bit since this issue was made, the general conclusion seems to be that shared DTC/M objectives should appear as described here, while keeping non-shared DTC/M objectives as they currently appear and have appeared for years.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Just talking help wanted Extra attention is needed
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants