-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Having flake8 extensions install at system level will break projects and there is no way to disable them #488
Comments
In GitLab by @sigmavirus24 on Apr 30, 2016, 14:39
That would be using |
In GitLab by @ssbarnea on Aug 1, 2016, 06:31 Since the release of 3.x.x version of flake8, this bug is not more valid than ever. Now we are forced to add "flake8<3.0.0" to almost any python project we encounter and that's not because flake8 introduced few fixable new issues. The problem is that flake8 is now crashing in most of the cases due to the presence of different flake8 plugins.
It is unreasonable to assume that every plugin developer would update his plugin in order to make it work with flake8. At this moment my impression is that is impossible to tell flake8 to ignore any plugins that may have already being installed on the system. |
In GitLab by @sigmavirus24 on Aug 1, 2016, 07:38
We looked for incompatible plugins and all of the ones we found, were fixed and released by the authors (not all of whom are men).
This has never been the case. I think the case has been made for a |
In GitLab by @ssbarnea on Aug 1, 2016, 09:05 @sigmavirus24 thanks for the update. I will try to gather more feedback as it will emerge from my attempt to convert over 20 repositories to use newer version of flask. |
In GitLab by @sigmavirus24 on Aug 1, 2016, 09:16 Actually instead of |
In GitLab by @ssbarnea on Aug 1, 2016, 13:06 indeed, whitelisting is much better! please also consider the case where plugin discovery exceptions can be ignored (non fatal). We had at least 2-3 in the last weeks. |
In GitLab by @wbolster on Aug 5, 2016, 02:47 i think installing flake8 in a virtualenv and never loading anything that's not in that virtualenv is the most sane approach. is that possible? |
In GitLab by @ssbarnea on Nov 24, 2016, 10:12 Use of virtual environments does not solve the issue, imagine that we are running CI tests for validating compatibility with system installed packages (Python dependencies installed from RPMs instead of PIP). In fact pip usage is forbidden in such environment because it could mess the system configuration (overwriting packages installed from RPM). |
In GitLab by @asottile on Oct 2, 2020, 16:38 changed the description |
In GitLab by @ssbarnea on Apr 30, 2016, 14:27
Here is a very simple to replicate use case, just install
flake8-docstrings
and now run flake8 on any project that was already using it.You will have a change of over 99% to fail passing the flake8 tests, and there is no way to disable those plugins from inside the
setup.cfg
.I raise a bug month than a month ago on
flake8-docstrigs
regarding this issue and got no reply at all, it seems that the project not maintained at all.Assuming that that's not an isolated case we need a way to assure that the linting settings are locked within the
setup.cfg
, so the final result will not depend on whichever additional modules you may have installed on your system-modules.I know that someone with inevitably try to propose a virtual environment with
--no-site-packages
but please remember that those are not always possible, there are several use-cases where people are forced to import system-packages (like on continous integration systems where you cannot afford to increase the footprint of each build with 500MB just because your projects is using numpy and pandas).Flake8 needs an option to tell it to use a specific list of plugins and to ignore others.
See https://gitlab.com/pycqa/flake8-docstrings/issues/10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: