You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The API is currently enforcing the One-Log-Approach.
This is nice for analyzing issues, as all relevant messages will be in one log.
It is not so nice anymore, when you want to analyze the behavior of a reusable component, that would create its own logs, which are then "abducted" by the calling applications, as they are opening logs of their own.
A compromise that works for both scenarios would be nice.
Idea:
Every call to /USI/CL_BAL_FACTORY=>/USI/IF_BAL_FACTORY->CREATE_NEW_LOGGER should create a new logger instance
If the calling application already opened a log, then both logs should be "linked"
A trace-message should be created in the main-log and in the sub-log
The trace-messages should have a new data container (Type: Navigation; Target: The other log)
Top-Down-Navigation (Parent to child) in SLG1 should work WITHOUT authority checks - if a log was created in the context of an application and somebody is allowed to see the main log, the sub-logs should also be visible. Otherwise support might become impossible, which would render the entire API useless.
Bottom-Up-Navigation MUST have an authoritiy check in place. An authorization for a low-level-component could otherwise grant access to logs of various applications and potentially sensitive data.
Sub-Logs have to inherit their configuration (e.g. retention times) from their respective parent log. Otherwise sub-logs might be deleted before the parent, which would violate the One-Log-Approach.
Some points still need some clarification:
How to deal with sub-logs of reusable components, if the component does not close them?
Saving a parent log should always save and destroy child logs
The token passed by the parent log has to be valid for the sub-logs too
Creation of sub-logs should be optional (Add flag in /USI/BAL_LV_LOBJ?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The API is currently enforcing the One-Log-Approach.
This is nice for analyzing issues, as all relevant messages will be in one log.
It is not so nice anymore, when you want to analyze the behavior of a reusable component, that would create its own logs, which are then "abducted" by the calling applications, as they are opening logs of their own.
A compromise that works for both scenarios would be nice.
Idea:
Some points still need some clarification:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: