You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider turning lists of items into bool fields (e.g. SearchOptions.Return)
Drop Client.StartTLS in favor of a function which constructs an already-secured TLS connection
Ignore responses that don't make sense given the connection state (section 11.3)
Consider re-using the same *FetchBodySection pointers in the returned map, or make it easier to match a *FetchBodySection from a command
Drop Command because it's not extensible
Some values can be either seq num or UID, how to represent these? Examples: SearchData.Min/Max, SortCommand.Wait, ThreadData.Chain. Should we add separate UID types for each?
Continuation of #490
FetchItemData{Body,Binary}Section.Section
LITERAL+
Add IMAP4rev1 fallback for IDLE(imapclient: add IDLE fallback #543)ENABLE IMAP4rev2
on servers which also support IMAP4rev1Consider turning(Make SearchCriteria.Not a pointer #505)SearchCriteria.Not
into a pointer, instead of a sliceliteral8
SearchOptions.Return
)Client.StartTLS
in favor of a function which constructs an already-secured TLS connection*FetchBodySection
pointers in the returned map, or make it easier to match a*FetchBodySection
from a commandCommand
because it's not extensibleSearchData.Min/Max
,SortCommand.Wait
,ThreadData.Chain
. Should we add separate UID types for each?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: