Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARTART Last Call Review: section 4: why is a redirect mechanism suggested? #28

Open
Kevsy opened this issue Oct 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Kevsy
Copy link
Collaborator

Kevsy commented Oct 25, 2024

From Tim Bray's ARTART last call review:

Section 4. "since the physical location (URL) of the API Catalog document is
decided but the publisher... using HTTP Status Code 308". I'm wondering what
value suggesting a mechanism adds? And why 308? As long as I achieve the
result in the previous bullet point (wherever I get it from, it has to be the
same).

@Kevsy Kevsy self-assigned this Oct 25, 2024
@Kevsy Kevsy added the drafted Fixed in editor's local copy label Oct 29, 2024
@Kevsy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Kevsy commented Oct 29, 2024

Removed the mention of HTTP 308, changed 'As illustration' to 'For example', and removed the HTTP 308 code from the example.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant