Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question]: Is it possible to test multiarch (non x86_64) architecture easily? #63

Open
sarroutbi opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
triage/support Indicates an issue that is a support question.

Comments

@sarroutbi
Copy link
Member

I am wondering which possibility is available to test non x86_64 architecture:

  • Is it possible to simulate S390x / PPC64le architectures easily?
  • Can this be tested somehow through virt-manager, minikube or related?

I would like to test multiarch build generated by Konflux

@prb112 : May I CC you to provide some feedback regarding this?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added triage/support Indicates an issue that is a support question. and removed question labels Oct 16, 2024
@prb112
Copy link

prb112 commented Nov 8, 2024

Hey Sergio

Thanks for reaching about Power/Z.

I'm going to try to answer:

Is it possible to simulate S390x / PPC64le architectures easily?
Yes. You can simulate it via using multiarch/qemu-user-static

However, it's a translation from s390x/ppc64le to the native instruction set. It can be very slow, and is on a container-by-container basis.

Can this be tested somehow through virt-manager, minikube or related?
Yes, this could be tested through ppc64le-cloud/kind-image

$ kind create cluster --image quay.io/powercloud/kind-node:v1.30.2

However, once you have the image, you'll still want to be on Power hardware.

We have a team with access to testing hardware / software and would be happy to work with you on testing.

Thanks,

Paul

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
triage/support Indicates an issue that is a support question.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants