Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Money-Weighted Rate of Return (MWRR) #4279

Open
chatRG opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Money-Weighted Rate of Return (MWRR) #4279

chatRG opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@chatRG
Copy link

chatRG commented Oct 9, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's very important for me to have a rate that takes into consideration my cash flow in/outs. This rate solves this problem.

Describe the solution you'd like
To add as a widget in the Performance tab.

While IRR and MWRR are similar, there are situations where they can produce different results, especially when dealing with irregular cash flows or when the timing of cash flows significantly impacts the investment's performance.

MWRR is more relevant as it reflects the actual return achieved by an investor.

@bentrim71
Copy link

I'm new to this group and very well built product, but it appears that the issue described above (as well with a lot of the rate of return issues) cannot be solved with a separate "deposit account."
To resolve this issue, a generic $CASH symbol could be used to replace the deposit account since most broker dealers use sweep accounts.

@mierin12
Copy link
Contributor

Could you develop a bit about the 'situation where they can produce different results' ? Do you have exemples ?

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/money-weighted-return.asp

Investopedia says they are the same

The MWRR is equivalent to the internal rate of return (IRR).

@bentrim71
Copy link

bentrim71 commented Oct 17, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants