-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for multiple teams #7
Comments
Happy to take a PR or if it benefits your company, I'd be happy to discuss
sponsored development. Feel free to email me on [email protected]
…On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, 09:42 Patrick Metzdorf, ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi there,
I really like this idea (and the amount of time that can be saved this
way).
However, we have a couple of teams, each of whom usually hold their own
retrospectives.
I understand from the blog post
<https://remysharp.com/2016/08/22/remote-retrospectives-with-retrobot>,
that currently the bot holds a single state and you'd need to run a new bot
for each additional team that wants to use it.
It would be great if the bot could keep track of which channel it is
holding a retro in (e.g. #retro-team1 vs. #retro-team2 etc.) and conduct
separate retros based on that.
Just an idea.
Many thanks!
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA1hIgEsRSKoQIow4cHhTzopehWSuBMks5rqhl5gaJpZM4MsrDn>
.
|
Probably not anytime soon, but at least the idea is logged in case we or
somebody else get to make that update someday. ;)
…On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:47 AM Remy Sharp ***@***.***> wrote:
Happy to take a PR or if it benefits your company, I'd be happy to discuss
sponsored development. Feel free to email me on ***@***.***
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, 09:42 Patrick Metzdorf, ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I really like this idea (and the amount of time that can be saved this
> way).
> However, we have a couple of teams, each of whom usually hold their own
> retrospectives.
> I understand from the blog post
> <https://remysharp.com/2016/08/22/remote-retrospectives-with-retrobot>,
> that currently the bot holds a single state and you'd need to run a new
bot
> for each additional team that wants to use it.
>
> It would be great if the bot could keep track of which channel it is
> holding a retro in (e.g. #retro-team1 vs. #retro-team2 etc.) and conduct
> separate retros based on that.
>
> Just an idea.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#7>, or mute the thread
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA1hIgEsRSKoQIow4cHhTzopehWSuBMks5rqhl5gaJpZM4MsrDn
>
> .
>
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG8xJMDMGpKOh42iUlu8EYUZa-vDj2Cxks5rqhqYgaJpZM4MsrDn>
.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi there,
I really like this idea (and the amount of time that can be saved this way).
However, we have a couple of teams, each of whom usually hold their own retrospectives.
I understand from the blog post, that currently the bot holds a single state and you'd need to run a new bot for each additional team that wants to use it.
It would be great if the bot could keep track of which channel it is holding a retro in (e.g.
#retro-team1
vs.#retro-team2
etc.) and conduct separate retros based on that.Just an idea.
Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: