Should InMemoryBuffer be renamed? #4966
Unanswered
MartinZikmund
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
It does not need to be public, indeed. There's no point at exposing it at this point. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I will probably make a copy of the class to implement |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
What would you like to be added:
I have noticed Uno has an
InMemoryBuffer
public class, which is used in several places in the repo. UWP does not have this class, but has aBuffer
class, which seems to fulfill the same purpose. ShouldInMemoryBuffer
be renamed as part of breaking change roundup toBuffer
? It is unlikely anyone depends on it directly, as it can be constructed only internally and to the outside world always surfaced asIBuffer
.Why is this needed:
For which Platform:
Anything else we need to know?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions