Updates to Declarative Shadow DOM adopedStyleSheets #905

KurtCattiSchmidt · 2024-11-14T23:43:22Z

This PR updates the Shadow DOM stylesheet Sharing document based on feedback from TAG and WHATWG.

In particular:

The @sheet section is expanded
More declarative modules are spec'd out
A section on polyfills was added

This reverts commit 7eab993.

dandclark

LGTM with some minor feedback, thanks!

dandclark · 2024-11-15T01:36:41Z

ShadowDOM/explainer.md

+| Module type    | Script Module                                            | Declarative Module                                                                  |
+| -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| JavaScript     | `import { foo } from "./bar.js";`                        | TODO                                                                                |
+| CSS            | `import foo from "./bar.css" with { type: "css" };`      | `<script type="css-module" specifier="/bar.css">  ... </script>`                    |


For all of these, the "Script Module" column shows how the module would be consumed, but the "Declarative Module" column demos how the module would be defined.
It might be more consistent to have the "Declarative Module" instead show how the module would be consumed, e.g. <template shadowrootmode="open" adoptedstylesheets="/foo.css">.

dandclark · 2024-11-15T01:37:51Z

ShadowDOM/explainer.md

+
+The specification of `@sheet` could be modified to split the *definition* of stylesheets from the *application* of the style rules. With this modification, `@sheet` would *define* a stylesheet with its own set of rules, but not  *apply* the rules automatically. This would allow for defining stylesheets in a light DOM context and applying them only to the shadow roots. 
+
+With this behavior, the following example would have a a gray background and blue text only within the Shadow DOM: 


Suggested change

With this behavior, the following example would have a a gray background and blue text only within the Shadow DOM:

With this behavior, the following example would have a gray background and blue text only within the Shadow DOM:

dandclark · 2024-11-15T01:47:29Z

ShadowDOM/explainer.md

+  </template> 
+</template> 
+ ```
+Text within both shadow roots in the above example should be blue due to the `adoptedstylesheets` at each Shadow DOM layer. Note that it is not currently possible to export stylesheets *out* of shadow roots. 


Something I noticed here is that this approach doesn't separate the action of applying of the sheet to a shadow and of making it available to nested shadows. So, say I have a shadow A and A contains a nested shadow B. If I want to define a style in the light DOM and apply it only to shadow B, I can't do that; to make it available to B I have to pass it to A in adoptedstylesheets which will also apply it to A.

This doesn't need to block sharing this doc but is maybe worth a note; we have more thinking to do here.

From offline chat - Requiring @import in shadow DOM (same as light DOM) seems like it'd solve this, and make the usage feel more consistent.

dandclark · 2024-11-15T01:49:00Z

ShadowDOM/explainer.md

@@ -348,7 +425,7 @@ This proposal will add a new markup-based `adoptedstylesheets` property that clo
    :host {  
      color: red  
    }  
-</style>
+</style> 


Suggested change

</style>

</style>

(nit- stray space)

dandclark · 2024-11-15T01:49:24Z

ShadowDOM/explainer.md

@@ -362,7 +439,7 @@ Web authors can use the `adoptedstylesheets` property on the `<template>` elemen
      <!-- -->  
 </template>
 ```
-One requirement of this approach is that the current `adoptedStylesheets` JavaScript property would need to lift the “constructable” requirement for `adoptedStylesheets`. This was recently agreed upon by the CSSWG but has not been implemented yet: [ Can we lift the restriction on constructed flag for adoptedStylesheets?](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10013#issuecomment-2165396092)
+One requirement of this approach is that the current `adoptedStylesheets` JavaScript property would need to lift the “constructable” requirement for `adoptedStylesheets`. This was recently agreed upon by the CSSWG but has not been implemented yet: [ Can we lift the restriction on constructed flag for adoptedStylesheets?](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10013#issuecomment-2165396092) 


Suggested change

One requirement of this approach is that the current `adoptedStylesheets` JavaScript property would need to lift the “constructable” requirement for `adoptedStylesheets`. This was recently agreed upon by the CSSWG but has not been implemented yet: [ Can we lift the restriction on constructed flag for adoptedStylesheets?](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10013#issuecomment-2165396092)

One requirement of this approach is that the current `adoptedStylesheets` JavaScript property would need to lift the “constructable” requirement for `adoptedStylesheets`. This was recently agreed upon by the CSSWG but has not been implemented yet: [ Can we lift the restriction on constructed flag for adoptedStylesheets?](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10013#issuecomment-2165396092)

stray space

dandclark · 2024-11-15T01:55:32Z

ShadowDOM/explainer.md

+```html
+<script> 
+  function supportsDeclarativeAdoptedStyleSheets() { 
+    return document.createElement('template')["adoptedStyleSheets"] == undefined; 


Suggested change

return document.createElement('template')["adoptedStyleSheets"] == undefined;

return document.createElement('template')["adoptedStyleSheets"] != undefined;

dandclark · 2024-11-15T02:01:14Z

ShadowDOM/explainer.md

 ```
+
+For the Declarative CSS Modules approach, [one suggestion](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10673#issuecomment-2453512552) is to bind the `<link>` tag's `href` attribute value to the CSS module identifier and add a new attribute (`noadoptedstylesheets`) to avoid double-applying stylesheets. 


Suggested change

For the Declarative CSS Modules approach, [one suggestion](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10673#issuecomment-2453512552) is to bind the `<link>` tag's `href` attribute value to the CSS module identifier and add a new attribute (`noadoptedstylesheets`) to avoid double-applying stylesheets.

There was also a [suggestion](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10673#issuecomment-2453512552) for adding browser support to enable falling back to a normal `<link>` tag without the use of script, by binding the `<link>` tag's `href` attribute value to the CSS module identifier and adding a new attribute (`noadoptedstylesheets`) to avoid double-applying stylesheets.

Optional suggestion for clarifying the purpose of this alternative.

KurtCattiSchmidt added 3 commits November 14, 2024 15:35

Initial commit

7eab993

Revert "Initial commit"

992f2d0

This reverts commit 7eab993.

Initial commit

b4dc10c

dandclark approved these changes Nov 15, 2024

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Updates to Declarative Shadow DOM adopedStyleSheets #905

Updates to Declarative Shadow DOM adopedStyleSheets #905

KurtCattiSchmidt commented Nov 14, 2024

dandclark left a comment

dandclark Nov 15, 2024

dandclark Nov 15, 2024

dandclark Nov 15, 2024

dandclark Nov 15, 2024

aluhrs13 Nov 15, 2024

dandclark Nov 15, 2024

dandclark Nov 15, 2024

dandclark Nov 15, 2024

dandclark Nov 15, 2024


		The specification of `@sheet` could be modified to split the definition of stylesheets from the application of the style rules. With this modification, `@sheet` would define a stylesheet with its own set of rules, but not apply the rules automatically. This would allow for defining stylesheets in a light DOM context and applying them only to the shadow roots.

		With this behavior, the following example would have a a gray background and blue text only within the Shadow DOM:

	return document.createElement('template')["adoptedStyleSheets"] == undefined;
	return document.createElement('template')["adoptedStyleSheets"] != undefined;

		```

		For the Declarative CSS Modules approach, [one suggestion](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10673#issuecomment-2453512552) is to bind the `<link>` tag's `href` attribute value to the CSS module identifier and add a new attribute (`noadoptedstylesheets`) to avoid double-applying stylesheets.

	For the Declarative CSS Modules approach, [one suggestion](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10673#issuecomment-2453512552) is to bind the `<link>` tag's `href` attribute value to the CSS module identifier and add a new attribute (`noadoptedstylesheets`) to avoid double-applying stylesheets.
	There was also a [suggestion](https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10673#issuecomment-2453512552) for adding browser support to enable falling back to a normal `<link>` tag without the use of script, by binding the `<link>` tag's `href` attribute value to the CSS module identifier and adding a new attribute (`noadoptedstylesheets`) to avoid double-applying stylesheets.

Updates to Declarative Shadow DOM adopedStyleSheets #905

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Updates to Declarative Shadow DOM adopedStyleSheets #905

Conversation

KurtCattiSchmidt commented Nov 14, 2024

dandclark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment