-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a conformance test for MultipleInputFeatureRequirement on Workflow outputs #169
Conversation
@@ -3532,3 +3532,15 @@ | |||
doc: | | |||
Use of $(runtime.outdir) for outputBinding glob. | |||
tags: [ required, command_line_tool ] | |||
|
|||
- label: multiple-input-feature-requirement |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
p.s.: was reading the doc for conformance tests, and noticed this line:
label: a short list of underscore (_) separated words that succinctly identifies and explains the test.
I had already used dashes, as I did in the previous test, where I followed the pattern of the previous test… Is there a reason for underscores? Should we fix the existing labels? Or maybe update https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2/blob/1.2.1_proposed/CONFORMANCE_TESTS.md?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm.. I don't have a strong opinion right now, except that we should be consistent. Can you make a separate issue to discuss this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree! Done: #191
Thanks
1d69046
to
e64d342
Compare
Rebased and fixed conflicts. |
For common-workflow-language/common-workflow-language#637
Tried to write a test that calls
echo-tool.cwl
twice, storing the output, and then uses both values in the workflow outputs. Confirmed it fails without theMultipleInputFeatureRequirement
.