Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix lastActivity not being initialized properly #354

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sgraband
Copy link
Contributor

  • Improve and document debugging of operator and service
  • Minor improvement: Local testing values should only pull IfNotPresent
  • Fix lastActivity not being initialized properly
    • We need to set it after the resource has been created.
    • Therefore it is now handled by the operator not the service.
    • Add warning in case resources are edited before being applied to the cluster.
    • Only check HANDLED sessions from the activity tracking.
    • Other resources should be cleaned up differently.

I would assume that this is the most common use case.
We need to set it after the resource has been created.
Therefore it is now handled by the operator not the service.
Add warning in case resources are edited before being applied to the cluster.
Only check HANDLED sessions from the activity tracking.
Other resources should be cleaned up differently.
@sgraband
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lucas-koehler Could you review this?

Copy link
Contributor

@lucas-koehler lucas-koehler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @sgraband the code changes and the updated documentation look good to me ✨ I added two small non-blocking remarks inline

@sgraband
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgraband commented Oct 1, 2024

Thanks for the comments/suggestions @lucas-koehler. I added both of them. Could you take another quick look?

Copy link
Contributor

@lucas-koehler lucas-koehler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates. LGTM ❇️

@sgraband sgraband merged commit 5bf626e into main Oct 1, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants