Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add execution stats header to the ut response #3882

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abhimanyubabbar
Copy link
Contributor

@abhimanyubabbar abhimanyubabbar commented Nov 15, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

We are adding two new headers only in the response to the /customTransform call in the user-transformer service.

The two headers and there format are as follows:

  1. X-Response-Time:105.23ms
  2. X-Instance-ID:<instance-id>/<worker-id>

In case the system is unable to determine the instance-id and worker-id from the env it will use the value default for the instance-id and master for the worker-id. So overall the valud of the X-Instance-ID will be default/master

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves DAT-1713

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new generic utility introduced or modified. Please explain the changes.

N/A

Any technical or performance related pointers to consider with the change?

N/A

@coderabbitai review


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes?

  • Is the PR limited to one linear task?

  • Are relevant unit and component test-cases added in new readability format?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

@abhimanyubabbar abhimanyubabbar added the DO NOT MERGE Don't merge this PR without having discussion label Nov 15, 2024
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DO NOT MERGE Don't merge this PR without having discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants